• 619.866.3444
  • info@socal.law
  • ProVisors
  • Payments
Gupta Evans and Ayres
  • What We Do
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
  • Who We Are
  • Our Team
    • Ajay Gupta
    • Chris Evans
    • Jake Ayres
    • Alessandro Nolfo
    • Aurora Gallardo
    • Mike Covington
    • Alexander Gomez
  • How We Help
    • Referral Partner Process
    • Legal Proceedings Process
    • Case Stories
  • Resources
    • The Blog
    • Our Events
    • For Lawyers
    • Useful Forms
    • Video Library
  • Payments
  • Get In Touch
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

In the Weeds on the SAFE Banking Act

May 20, 2019/in All Blog Posts, Cannabis, Corporate Litigation/by Jake Ayres

In tax season of 2019, a legal cannabis grower walked a nerve-wracking 20 yards from the parking lot to a California government office to pay his state taxes—with a pile of $350,000 in cash.  The illegality of cannabis at the federal level has largely shut cannabis businesses—legal at the state level—out of traditional banking.  As a result, cannabis businesses operate on an all-cash basis, leading to cash payments to employees, vendors, professional service providers, utilities, and government entities.  While this has been a boon to the armored transport and logistics industries, cannabis businesses striving to remain within the contours of the law find themselves bearing the considerable burdens of operating on an all-cash basis, racking up considerable overhead to protect large sums of cash from would-be thieves.  Given the onus placed on cannabis businesses—and, arguably, neighbors wary of 24/7 armed guards—cannabis business surely cannot remain excluded from banking forever, can they? Enter the Secure And Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act of 2019

This Act would open the federal floodgates holding back a swollen river of cannabis money, allowing cannabis business to bank their money with traditional financial institutions.  The SAFE Banking Act, cosponsored by a bipartisan group of 180 representatives, has already been approved for a U.S. House of Representatives floor vote after passing the House Financial Services Committee on March 28, 2019, with a 45 to 15 vote.  On April 8, 2019, the House Judiciary Committee referred the bill to the House Committee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, where it has not yet received a vote.  A week later, companion legislation was reintroduced in the Senate.  On May 9, the attorneys general of 33 states (along with Washington D.C. and four U.S. Territories) sent a letter to Congress to advocate for the bill’s passage, arguing that “the reality of the [cannabis industry] requires federal rules that permit a sensible banking regime for legal businesses.” 

The SAFE Banking Act would provide safe harbor for financial institutions to accept money from “cannabis-related legitimate businesses” (“CRLBs”)—that is, cannabis businesses that are in compliance with the applicable state law regime—in that they would be immunized from adverse federal action, whether by federal regulators or prosecutors.  The bill would also immunize funds derived from state-legal cannabis transactions from the federal money laundering statute.  Finally, the bill also would immunize collateral interests held by banks in loans provided to the cannabis industry from asset forfeiture, making possible bank foreclosures on cannabis business assets, such as farms or other real estate.  

The bill also goes beyond CRLBs to provide banking access to “service providers” to the cannabis industry.  The bill’s definition of “service provider” is broadly worded to include any business that “sells goods or services” to a CRLB, and explicitly includes real estate professionals, lawyers, and “other licensed services”—e.g. CPAs.  In particular, the bill would extend the safe harbor and money laundering exemptions to funds deposited by service providers in addition to CRLBs.  In other words, the vendors and professionals providing services to the cannabis industry would also be allowed to bank money derived from their cannabis industry clients with financial institutions.  This would be a financial security blanket for the notoriously risk-averse legal profession, although California lawyers have already obtained a measure of protection with the November 2018 amendment to California Rule of Professional Responsibility 1.2.1, which allows California attorneys to counsel legal California cannabis businesses, provided that they advise said business regarding federal illegality.  

The House Financial Services Committee passed several amendments to the SAFE Banking Act that alter its scope.  Representative Steve Stivers successfully proposed an amendment that explicitly included insurers of CRLBs as a class of businesses to which banks can provide financial services.  Representative Ed Perlmutter also successfully proposed several amendments, the most significant of which broadened the definition of “financial services” in the bill to include armored car services and “money transmitting businesses,” which would presumably open the door to cannabis transactions via PayPal, Venmo, and Western Union.  

Although the SAFE Banking Act’s House floor debate does not yet have a set date, the bipartisan support in the House, along with the support of a majority of the states attorneys general, suggests that it may pass the House.  However, the Senate Banking Committee chair, Senator Mike Crapo, has openly stated his opposition to his committee’s considering the bill.  However, legislative 180s on cannabis are not unheard of, such as former Speaker of the House and cannabis opponent John Boehner’s sudden support for cannabis legalization after joining the board of cannabis company Acreage Holdings.  The SAFE Banking Act would provide relief for a cannabis industry eager to pay its employees and taxes electronically, and would also enervate financial institutions with the munchies for cash from the $16 billion legal U.S. cannabis industry.  Although the legislation remains a possibility rather than a reality, the traction and bipartisan support the bill has received suggests that legalized banking for cannabis industry funds is a question of “when” rather than “if.”  Regardless of its ultimate success, the SAFE Banking Act merits monitoring by the cannabis and financial sectors such that they can be prepared for the coming changes to their respective industries.  In any case, the days of grocery bags full of cash as tax payments seem untenable in the long term.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
  • Link to Instagram
https://socal.law/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/pexels-kindel-media-7668047-scaled.jpg 1920 2560 Jake Ayres https://socal.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/gupta-evans-ayres_brand-identity_v4-02.png Jake Ayres2019-05-20 23:49:002022-06-21 23:37:56In the Weeds on the SAFE Banking Act
You might also like
Blame Games & Automobiles: Rattagan v. Uber Technologies and the Potential Extension of California’s Fraud Exception to the Economic Loss Rule
Bid Protests and Damages Availability
California Supreme Court Says Lenders Owe No Duty of Care in Loan Modification Negotiations
An Offer You Can’t Refuse: Civil Extortion or Demand Letter
The CBD FAQ
Chapter 420, Part II: Closing the Book on Cannabis-Adjacent Bankruptcy

Search Blogs

Categories

Recent Blogs

  • Out of the Frying Pan: AB 1200 and the New Online and Physical Labeling Requirements for California CookwareFebruary 22, 2023 - 12:15 am
  • The First Amendment, Bad Reviews, and You: So You’ve Been Smeared on the Internet – Part IOctober 4, 2022 - 8:49 pm
  • GEA’s Demand Letter to Union Bank Secures Release of Erroneous LoanJune 10, 2022 - 11:43 pm

Connect

HEADQUARTERS

1620 Fifth Ave #650
San Diego, CA 92101

CONTACT

P: 619-866-3444
F: 619-330-2055
E: info@socal.law

CONNECT

  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Twitter
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to Youtube
gupta evans ayres brand identity RGB Vertical White 2
smal bbb Logo
Avvo Small Logo
superlawyers Logo
small userway Logo
SDCBA Logo

© Gupta Evans & Ayres 2022 – all rights reserved

site design by digitalstoryteller.io

1620 Fifth Ave #650
San Diego, CA 92101

P: 619-866-3444
F: 619-330-2055
E: info@socal.law

  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Twitter
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to Youtube
gupta evans ayres brand identity RGB Vertical White 2

small userway Logo
smal bbb Logo
Avvo Small Logo
superlawyers Logo
SDCBA Logo

© Gupta Evans & Ayres 2022 – all rights reserved

site design by digitalstoryteller.io

Insolvency and Corporate Responsibilities To CreditorsAn Offer You Can’t Refuse: Civil Extortion or Demand Letter Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Accept settings

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Accept settingsHide notification only