{"id":3613,"date":"2022-04-21T20:57:24","date_gmt":"2022-04-21T20:57:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/socal.law\/?p=3613"},"modified":"2022-06-21T23:07:54","modified_gmt":"2022-06-21T23:07:54","slug":"prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/","title":{"rendered":"Prior Publication Does Not Always Bar Trade Secret Protection"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Does a published algorithm bar trade secret protection of that algorithm?&nbsp; The answer is not as simple as it seems.&nbsp; Earlier this year, the Federal Circuit in <em>Masimo Corp.<\/em> held that the prior publication by a third party of trade secret information does not bar trade secret information.&nbsp; <em>Masimo Corp. v. True Wearables, Inc., <\/em>No. 2021-2146, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1923, at *17 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 24, 2022).&nbsp; This seems counter intuitive given that one of the requirements of a protectable trade secret is that the information to be protected is not generally known to the public. 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 1839; Cal Civ Code \u00a7 3426.1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This blog will explore the topic of whether prior publication of information by a third party bars trade secret protection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I recently posted a blog article about where I discussed the laws around trade secrets generally.&nbsp; To recap:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Trade secrets are defined under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 1839<a href=\"#_ftn1\" id=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a> and Cal Civ Code \u00a7 3426.1<a href=\"#_ftn2\" id=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a>.&nbsp; Boiled down, three things must be true for the information you seek to protect:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>Derives independent economic value;<\/strong><\/li><li><strong>Not generally known to the public;<\/strong><\/li><li>Reasonable measures were taken to keep the information secret.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><u>Case Background<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In <em>Masimo Corp.<\/em>, Masimo Corporation and Ceracor Labortories, Inc. (collectively, \u201cMasimo\u201d) sued True Wearables, Inc. (\u201cTrue Wearables\u201d) and Dr. Marcelo Lamego for trade secret misappropriation.&nbsp; Specifically, Masimo alleged that Dr. Lamego misappropriated the trade secret known as \u201cTSS\u201d.&nbsp; TSS is related to Masimo\u2019s proprietary algorithm used to solve optimization problems surrounding oximeters<a href=\"#_ftn3\" id=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a>.&nbsp; Masimo\u2019s TSS uses a simple linear algebraic equation: \u201cSpHb = Ax + By + Cz . . .,\u201d where x, y, and z are absorption measurements (e.g., wavelength readouts) from the oximeter and A, B, and C are coefficients which relay important information to the user.&nbsp; <em>Masimo Corp.<\/em> at 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dr. Lamego was employed at Ceracor Laboratories, Inc. before leaving and founding True Wearables.&nbsp; <em>Id.<\/em> at 3.&nbsp; Dr. Lamego the \u201cOxxiom device\u201d and later received a notice of allowance for a patent for the Oxxiom device.&nbsp; <em>Id.<\/em>&nbsp; Masimo sued True Wearables in district court, moving for preliminary injunction on trade secret claims arguing that the provisional application upon which the nonprovisional application claims priority<a href=\"#_ftn4\" id=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a> disclosed a variation of the TSS algorithm, which would eventually become public knowledge.&nbsp; <em>Id.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The district court followed CUTSA definition of a trade secret mentioned above.&nbsp; True Wearables argued that the TSS algorithm was \u201cgenerally known\u201d by the public because it was previously published in a conference paper by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (\u201cIEEE\u201d).&nbsp; <em>Id.<\/em> at 7.&nbsp; Specifically, the IEEE paper disclosed \u201can algorithm equivalent to the TSS and that has been cited over 1,200 times.\u201d&nbsp; <em>Id.<\/em>&nbsp; True Wearables also presented expert testimony stating that \u201cvariants of the TSS have appeared in statistics textbooks since the early 1960s\u201d and \u201can algorithm equivalent to the TSS was \u2018widely known and widely used by the statistics community\u2019\u201d prior to the lawsuit.&nbsp; <em>Id.<\/em> at 8.&nbsp; The district court ruled that at best, the publications could be a basis for determining that the TSS was readily ascertainable.&nbsp; <em>Id.<\/em> (citing&nbsp; <em>Masimo Corp. v. True Wearables, Inc.<\/em>, No. SACV 18-2001 JVS (JDEx), 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88038, at *13 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2021)).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><u>Analysis<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Although True Wearables cited various cases that \u201cdisplay in a single publication of an alleged trade secret in its entirety is conclusive evidence that it is generally known\u201d, the Federal Circuit found those cases to be distinguishable because the cited cases involved either (a) disclosure in an unrelated field or (b) disclosure was authorized by the owner of the trade secret thereby extinguishing trade secret protection.&nbsp; <em>Masimo Corp.<\/em> at 10.&nbsp; The Federal Circuit stated that the mere fact that the trade secret has been published \u201cdoes not necessarily compel a finding that the information cannot maintain its status as a trade secret for a party in an entirely different field from the one to which the publication was addressed.\u201d&nbsp; <em>Id.<\/em> at 12.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The true downfall for True Wearables\u2019 argument was that the algorithm or variants of the algorithm were published to the statistics community, which the Federal Circuit deemed to be far enough removed to be considered unrelated to the medical field.&nbsp; Just because those in the statistics community were aware of the algorithm does not necessarily mean that the algorithm would be generally known by \u201centities who develop noninvasive blood content detectors\u201d such that said entities could derive economic value from the disclosure.&nbsp; <em>Id.<\/em> at 13.&nbsp; For example, if the algorithm was disclosed to the healthcare community at large, True Wearables may have had a stronger argument that TSS was \u201cgenerally known.\u201d&nbsp; However, the Federal Circuit found this to not be the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><u>Takeaway<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Although the case is ongoing, the distinction in whether \u201cpublication\u201d is damning towards trade secret protection is worth noting.&nbsp; Here, the inquiry shifted to whether the publication in an unrelated field is far enough removed such that those in the relevant field would not be able to obtain economic benefit of the disclosure.&nbsp; While the <em>Masimo Corp.<\/em> ruling might seem surprising on its face, the Federal Circuit\u2019s line of reasoning is not completely unfamiliar. &nbsp;Interestingly enough, the logic here\u2014although not completely parallel\u2014seems to be consistent with the rules around other areas of intellectual property.&nbsp; For instance, two trademarks can exist simultaneously in unrelated fields.&nbsp; Also, a patent publication is not <em>prima facie<\/em> prior art if the publication exists in an unrelated field and there is no motivation to combine. &nbsp;At the end of the day, the Federal Circuit is affirming its stance that determinations of the prongs of trade secret protection is fact intensive as seen in <em>Masimo Corp<\/em>.&nbsp; It is important to note that despite the preliminary injunction granted in favor of Masimo, True Wearables may still succeed on the merits as the case moves forward.&nbsp; <em>Masimo Corp.<\/em> is certainly a case worth keeping an eye on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-css-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" id=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> (3) the term \u201ctrade secret\u201d means all forms and types of financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineering information, including patterns, plans, compilations, program devices, formulas, designs, prototypes, methods, techniques, processes, procedures, programs, or codes, whether tangible or intangible, and whether or how stored, compiled, or memorialized physically, electronically, graphically, photographically, or in writing if\u2014(A) the owner thereof has taken reasonable measures to keep such information secret; and (B) the information derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through proper means by, another person who can obtain economic value from the disclosure or use of the information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" id=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> According to the California Trade Secrets Act (\u201cCUTSA\u201d) (d) \u201cTrade secret\u201d means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" id=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a> Without going into the specifics, oximeters are basically LED emitting fingertip sensors used to measure the concentration of total hemoglobin, i.e., blood oxygen levels, in a patient.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" id=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> Fun fact: a provisional application allows applicants to basically make adjustments to the application for one year while securing an earlier filing date.&nbsp; Applicants can then file a nonprovisional application\u2014which is more or less the completed version of the provisional application\u2014and claim the benefit or \u201cpriority\u201d of the earlier filing date of provisional application.&nbsp; In other words, the nonprovisional application would then be considered to have been filed at on the date the provisional application was filed.&nbsp; The priority\/filing date is important because the U.S. moved from a \u201cfirst to invent\u201d filing system to a \u201cfirst to file\u201d system.&nbsp; This means that whoever files first rather than invents first will generally be awarded the patent.&nbsp; For example, if two applicants filed a patent application for the same or similar invention, the applicant with the earlier filing date will generally be the one to be awarded the patent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Does a published algorithm bar trade secret protection of that algorithm?&nbsp; The answer is not as simple as it seems.&nbsp; Earlier this year, the Federal Circuit in Masimo Corp. held that the prior publication by a third party of trade secret information does not bar trade secret information.&nbsp; Masimo Corp. v. True Wearables, Inc., No. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":3757,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Prior Publication Does Not Always Bar Trade Secret Protection - Gupta Evans and Ayres<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prior Publication Does Not Always Bar Trade Secret Protection - Gupta Evans and Ayres\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Does a published algorithm bar trade secret protection of that algorithm?&nbsp; The answer is not as simple as it seems.&nbsp; Earlier this year, the Federal Circuit in Masimo Corp. held that the prior publication by a third party of trade secret information does not bar trade secret information.&nbsp; Masimo Corp. v. True Wearables, Inc., No. [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Gupta Evans and Ayres\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-21T20:57:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-06-21T23:07:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/pexels-jan-van-bizar-12485504-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John Ahn\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"John Ahn\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/\",\"name\":\"Prior Publication Does Not Always Bar Trade Secret Protection - Gupta Evans and Ayres\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/pexels-jan-van-bizar-12485504-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-21T20:57:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-21T23:07:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/83142698dd7f7bf0802a905d3f8f4c43\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/pexels-jan-van-bizar-12485504-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/pexels-jan-van-bizar-12485504-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":1707,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prior Publication Does Not Always Bar Trade Secret Protection\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/\",\"name\":\"Gupta Evans and Ayres\",\"description\":\"Creative Strategies, Real World Solutions\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/83142698dd7f7bf0802a905d3f8f4c43\",\"name\":\"John Ahn\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/John-Ahn-1030x1030-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/John-Ahn-1030x1030-1.png\",\"caption\":\"John Ahn\"},\"description\":\"JOHN AHN, ESQ. ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prior Publication Does Not Always Bar Trade Secret Protection - Gupta Evans and Ayres","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prior Publication Does Not Always Bar Trade Secret Protection - Gupta Evans and Ayres","og_description":"Does a published algorithm bar trade secret protection of that algorithm?&nbsp; The answer is not as simple as it seems.&nbsp; Earlier this year, the Federal Circuit in Masimo Corp. held that the prior publication by a third party of trade secret information does not bar trade secret information.&nbsp; Masimo Corp. v. True Wearables, Inc., No. [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/","og_site_name":"Gupta Evans and Ayres","article_published_time":"2022-04-21T20:57:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-06-21T23:07:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1707,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/pexels-jan-van-bizar-12485504-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"John Ahn","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"John Ahn","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/","name":"Prior Publication Does Not Always Bar Trade Secret Protection - Gupta Evans and Ayres","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/pexels-jan-van-bizar-12485504-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-21T20:57:24+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-21T23:07:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/83142698dd7f7bf0802a905d3f8f4c43"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/pexels-jan-van-bizar-12485504-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/pexels-jan-van-bizar-12485504-scaled.jpg","width":1707,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/prior-publication-does-not-always-bar-trade-secret-protection\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/socal.law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prior Publication Does Not Always Bar Trade Secret Protection"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/","name":"Gupta Evans and Ayres","description":"Creative Strategies, Real World Solutions","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/socal.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/83142698dd7f7bf0802a905d3f8f4c43","name":"John Ahn","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/John-Ahn-1030x1030-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/John-Ahn-1030x1030-1.png","caption":"John Ahn"},"description":"JOHN AHN, ESQ. ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY"}]}},"featured_image_src":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/pexels-jan-van-bizar-12485504-scaled.jpg","featured_image_src_square":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/pexels-jan-van-bizar-12485504-scaled.jpg","author_info":{"display_name":"John Ahn","author_link":"https:\/\/socal.law\/author\/john-ahn\/"},"rbea_author_info":{"display_name":"John Ahn","author_link":"https:\/\/socal.law\/author\/john-ahn\/"},"rbea_excerpt_info":"Does a published algorithm bar trade secret protection of that algorithm?&nbsp; The answer is not as simple as it seems.&nbsp; Earlier this year, the Federal Circuit in Masimo Corp. held that the prior publication by a third party of trade secret information does not bar trade secret information.&nbsp; Masimo Corp. v. True Wearables, Inc., No. [&hellip;]","category_list":"<a href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/category\/news\/\" rel=\"category tag\">All Blog Posts<\/a>","comments_num":"0 comments","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3613"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3613"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3613\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3758,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3613\/revisions\/3758"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3757"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}