{"id":3296,"date":"2019-05-20T23:49:00","date_gmt":"2019-05-20T23:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/socal.law\/?p=3296"},"modified":"2022-06-21T23:37:56","modified_gmt":"2022-06-21T23:37:56","slug":"safe-and-sound","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/","title":{"rendered":"In the Weeds on the SAFE Banking Act"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In tax season of 2019, a legal cannabis grower walked a nerve-wracking 20 yards from the parking lot to a California government office to pay his state taxes\u2014with a pile of $350,000 in cash<\/a>.  The illegality of cannabis at the federal level has largely shut cannabis businesses\u2014legal at the state level\u2014out of traditional banking.  As a result, cannabis businesses operate on an all-cash basis, leading to cash payments to employees, vendors, professional service providers, utilities, and government entities.  While this has been a boon to the armored transport and logistics industries<\/a>, cannabis businesses striving to remain within the contours of the law find themselves bearing the considerable burdens of operating on an all-cash basis, racking up considerable overhead to protect large sums of cash from would-be thieves.  Given the onus placed on cannabis businesses\u2014and, arguably, neighbors wary of 24\/7 armed guards<\/a>\u2014cannabis business surely cannot remain excluded from banking forever, can they? Enter the Secure And Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act of 2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This Act would open the federal floodgates holding back a swollen river of cannabis money, allowing cannabis business to bank their money with traditional financial institutions.  The SAFE Banking Act, cosponsored by a bipartisan group of 180 representatives, has already been approved for a U.S. House of Representatives floor vote after passing the House Financial Services Committee on March 28, 2019, with a 45 to 15 vote.  On April 8, 2019, the House Judiciary Committee referred the bill to the House Committee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, where it has not yet received a vote.  A week later, companion legislation was reintroduced in the Senate<\/a>.  On May 9, the attorneys general of 33 states (along with Washington D.C. and four U.S. Territories) sent a letter to Congress to advocate for the bill\u2019s passage, arguing that \u201cthe reality of the [cannabis industry] requires federal rules that permit a sensible banking regime for legal businesses.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The SAFE Banking Act would provide safe harbor for financial institutions to accept money from \u201ccannabis-related legitimate businesses\u201d (\u201cCRLBs\u201d)\u2014that is, cannabis businesses that are in compliance with the applicable state law regime\u2014in that they would be immunized from adverse federal action, whether by federal regulators or prosecutors.  The bill would also immunize funds derived from state-legal cannabis transactions from the federal money laundering statute.  Finally, the bill also would immunize collateral interests held by banks in loans provided to the cannabis industry from asset forfeiture, making possible bank foreclosures on cannabis business assets, such as farms or other real estate.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bill also goes beyond CRLBs to provide banking access to \u201cservice providers\u201d to the cannabis industry.  The bill\u2019s definition of \u201cservice provider\u201d is broadly worded to include any business that \u201csells goods or services\u201d to a CRLB, and explicitly includes real estate professionals, lawyers, and \u201cother licensed services\u201d\u2014e.g. CPAs.  In particular, the bill would extend the safe harbor and money laundering exemptions to funds deposited by service providers in addition to CRLBs.  In other words, the vendors and professionals providing services to the cannabis industry would also be allowed to bank money derived from their cannabis industry clients with financial institutions.  This would be a financial security blanket for the notoriously risk-averse legal profession, although California lawyers have already obtained a measure of protection with the November 2018 amendment to California Rule of Professional Responsibility 1.2.1<\/a>, which allows California attorneys to counsel legal California cannabis businesses, provided that they advise said business regarding federal illegality.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The House Financial Services Committee passed several amendments to the SAFE Banking Act that alter its scope.  Representative Steve Stivers successfully proposed an amendment that explicitly included insurers of CRLBs as a class of businesses to which banks can provide financial services.  Representative Ed Perlmutter also successfully proposed several amendments, the most significant of which broadened the definition of \u201cfinancial services\u201d in the bill to include armored car services and \u201cmoney transmitting businesses,\u201d which would presumably open the door to cannabis transactions via PayPal, Venmo, and Western Union.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Although the SAFE Banking Act\u2019s House floor debate does not yet have a set date, the bipartisan support in the House, along with the support of a majority of the states attorneys general, suggests that it may pass the House.  However, the Senate Banking Committee chair, Senator Mike Crapo, has openly stated his opposition<\/a> to his committee\u2019s considering the bill.  However, legislative 180s on cannabis are not unheard of, such as former Speaker of the House and cannabis opponent John Boehner\u2019s sudden support for cannabis legalization<\/a> after joining the board of cannabis company Acreage Holdings.  The SAFE Banking Act would provide relief for a cannabis industry eager to pay its employees and taxes electronically, and would also enervate financial institutions with the munchies for cash from the $16 billion<\/a> legal U.S. cannabis industry.  Although the legislation remains a possibility rather than a reality, the traction and bipartisan support the bill has received suggests that legalized banking for cannabis industry funds is a question of \u201cwhen\u201d rather than \u201cif.\u201d  Regardless of its ultimate success, the SAFE Banking Act merits monitoring by the cannabis and financial sectors such that they can be prepared for the coming changes to their respective industries.  In any case, the days of grocery bags full of cash as tax payments seem untenable in the long term.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In tax season of 2019, a legal cannabis grower walked a nerve-wracking 20 yards from the parking lot to a California government office to pay his state taxes\u2014with a pile of $350,000 in cash.\u00a0 The illegality of cannabis at the federal level has largely shut cannabis businesses\u2014legal at the state level\u2014out of traditional banking.\u00a0 As a result, cannabis businesses operate on an all-cash basis, leading to cash payments to employees, vendors, professional service providers, utilities, and government entities.\u00a0 While this has been a boon to the\u00a0armored transport and logistics industries, cannabis businesses striving to remain within the contours of the law find themselves bearing the considerable burdens of operating on an all-cash basis, racking up considerable overhead to protect large sums of cash from would-be thieves.\u00a0 Given the onus placed on cannabis businesses\u2014and, arguably,\u00a0neighbors wary of 24\/7 armed guards\u2014cannabis business surely cannot remain excluded from banking forever, can they? Enter the Secure And Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act of 2019<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":3771,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,62,37],"tags":[57],"yoast_head":"\nIn the Weeds on the SAFE Banking Act - Gupta Evans and Ayres<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The SAFE Act would allow access to cannabis money, allowing cannabis business to bank their money with traditional financial institutions.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In the Weeds on the SAFE Banking Act - Gupta Evans and Ayres\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The SAFE Act would allow access to cannabis money, allowing cannabis business to bank their money with traditional financial institutions.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Gupta Evans and Ayres\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-20T23:49:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-06-21T23:37:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/pexels-kindel-media-7668047-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jake Ayres\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jake Ayres\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/\",\"name\":\"In the Weeds on the SAFE Banking Act - Gupta Evans and Ayres\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/pexels-kindel-media-7668047-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-20T23:49:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-21T23:37:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/a130f0be54771ee7347ff2a8d66baf6a\"},\"description\":\"The SAFE Act would allow access to cannabis money, allowing cannabis business to bank their money with traditional financial institutions.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/pexels-kindel-media-7668047-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/pexels-kindel-media-7668047-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1920},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In the Weeds on the SAFE Banking Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/\",\"name\":\"Gupta Evans and Ayres\",\"description\":\"Creative Strategies, Real World Solutions\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/a130f0be54771ee7347ff2a8d66baf6a\",\"name\":\"Jake Ayres\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Jake-Ayres-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Jake-Ayres-1.png\",\"caption\":\"Jake Ayres\"},\"description\":\"Favorite Quote: \u201cWhen you are content to be simply yourself, and don\u2019t compare or compete, everybody will respect you.\u201d \u2013 Lao Tzu\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In the Weeds on the SAFE Banking Act - Gupta Evans and Ayres","description":"The SAFE Act would allow access to cannabis money, allowing cannabis business to bank their money with traditional financial institutions.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In the Weeds on the SAFE Banking Act - Gupta Evans and Ayres","og_description":"The SAFE Act would allow access to cannabis money, allowing cannabis business to bank their money with traditional financial institutions.","og_url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/","og_site_name":"Gupta Evans and Ayres","article_published_time":"2019-05-20T23:49:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-06-21T23:37:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1920,"url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/pexels-kindel-media-7668047-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jake Ayres","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jake Ayres","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/","name":"In the Weeds on the SAFE Banking Act - Gupta Evans and Ayres","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/pexels-kindel-media-7668047-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2019-05-20T23:49:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-21T23:37:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/a130f0be54771ee7347ff2a8d66baf6a"},"description":"The SAFE Act would allow access to cannabis money, allowing cannabis business to bank their money with traditional financial institutions.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/pexels-kindel-media-7668047-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/pexels-kindel-media-7668047-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1920},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/safe-and-sound\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/socal.law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In the Weeds on the SAFE Banking Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/","name":"Gupta Evans and Ayres","description":"Creative Strategies, Real World Solutions","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/socal.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/a130f0be54771ee7347ff2a8d66baf6a","name":"Jake Ayres","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Jake-Ayres-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Jake-Ayres-1.png","caption":"Jake Ayres"},"description":"Favorite Quote: \u201cWhen you are content to be simply yourself, and don\u2019t compare or compete, everybody will respect you.\u201d \u2013 Lao Tzu"}]}},"featured_image_src":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/pexels-kindel-media-7668047-scaled.jpg","featured_image_src_square":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/pexels-kindel-media-7668047-scaled.jpg","author_info":{"display_name":"Jake Ayres","author_link":"https:\/\/socal.law\/author\/jake-ayres\/"},"rbea_author_info":{"display_name":"Jake Ayres","author_link":"https:\/\/socal.law\/author\/jake-ayres\/"},"rbea_excerpt_info":"In tax season of 2019, a legal cannabis grower walked a nerve-wracking 20 yards from the parking lot to a California government office to pay his state taxes\u2014with a pile of $350,000 in cash.\u00a0 The illegality of cannabis at the federal level has largely shut cannabis businesses\u2014legal at the state level\u2014out of traditional banking.\u00a0 As a result, cannabis businesses operate on an all-cash basis, leading to cash payments to employees, vendors, professional service providers, utilities, and government entities.\u00a0 While this has been a boon to the\u00a0armored transport and logistics industries, cannabis businesses striving to remain within the contours of the law find themselves bearing the considerable burdens of operating on an all-cash basis, racking up considerable overhead to protect large sums of cash from would-be thieves.\u00a0 Given the onus placed on cannabis businesses\u2014and, arguably,\u00a0neighbors wary of 24\/7 armed guards\u2014cannabis business surely cannot remain excluded from banking forever, can they? Enter the Secure And Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act of 2019","category_list":"<a href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/category\/news\/\" rel=\"category tag\">All Blog Posts<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/category\/cannabis\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Cannabis<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/category\/corporate-litigation\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Corporate Litigation<\/a>","comments_num":"0 comments","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3296"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3296"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3296\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3772,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3296\/revisions\/3772"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3771"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3296"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}