{"id":3125,"date":"2021-08-06T23:51:00","date_gmt":"2021-08-06T23:51:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/socal.law\/?p=3125"},"modified":"2022-06-22T00:34:04","modified_gmt":"2022-06-22T00:34:04","slug":"an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/","title":{"rendered":"An Offer You Can\u2019t Refuse, Part II: No Cash, No Claim"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-civil-extortion-or-demand-letter\/\">previous article<\/a>, I discussed the often blurry line between permissible pre-litigation communications and constitutionally unprotected extortionate demands.&nbsp; However, one important dimension of the civil extortion universe was left unaddressed there\u2014that is, no claim for civil extortion can lie unless the victim actually pays the extorter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In much of the foundational precedent surrounding the issue of civil extortion, courts are primarily concerned with the first step of the anti-SLAPP analysis, wherein the defendant has the burden of proving that the speech at issue is protected.&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>See, e.g.<\/em>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/ca-supreme-court\/1251110.html\"><em>Flatley v. Mauro<\/em><\/a>, 39 Cal. 4th 299, 320, 333 (2006).&nbsp; Under the anti-SLAPP statute\u2019s two-step, burden-shifting framework, only when the defendant has made a prima facie showing that their speech is protected activity does the plaintiff then have the burden of proving a likelihood of success on the merits of their claim.&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>Id.<\/em>&nbsp;at 314.&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>Flatley&nbsp;<\/em>and nearly all of its progeny deal with scenarios where the defendant fails to meet their initial burden because their communications are held to be extortionate as a matter of law, and as a result, those courts did not reach the second step of the analysis\u2014that is, whether the plaintiffs have viable claims for civil extortion.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If they had, most of those civil extortion claims would have been found lacking for the victim\u2019s failure to pay.<a href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#_ftn1\">[1]<\/a>&nbsp; Although extortionate demands may place communications outside of the protections of the constitution and the anti-SLAPP statute, merely receiving those communications does not on its own give rise to an actionable claim.&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>See&nbsp;<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/california\/court-of-appeal\/3d\/179\/408.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Fuhrman v. Cal. Satellite Sys.<\/em><\/a>, 179 Cal. App. 3d 408, 426 (1986),&nbsp;<em>overruled on other grounds by Silberg v. Anderson<\/em>, 50 Cal. 3d 205, 211 (1990).&nbsp; Although not termed an action for \u201ccivil extortion,\u201d the California Supreme Court \u201chas recognized a cause of action for the&nbsp;<em>recovery<\/em>&nbsp;of money obtained by the wrongful threat of criminal or civil prosecution.\u201d&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>Id.<\/em>&nbsp; Because California only recognizes a cause of action for recovery of extorted money, would-be victims of an extortionate demand who do not pay do not have a cause of action for civil extortion.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Indeed, in an&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.courts.ca.gov\/opinions\/nonpub\/H046773.PDF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">unpublished case<\/a>, the California Court of Appeal rejected a claim for \u201cattempted civil extortion\u201d for this exact reason.&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>Tran v. Eat Club<\/em>, No. H046773, 2020 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 5299, at *53-54 (Aug. 18, 2020).&nbsp; It is possible that a published case may take a different view, but allowing civil liability for \u201cattempted\u201d torts perhaps skirts too close to concepts of criminal liability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In short, although an extortionate demand letter may not be entitled to constitutional protections as a matter of law, that does not mean, ipso facto, that the plaintiff has a viable claim for civil extortion.&nbsp; Indeed, without money changing hands, California law currently prohibits recovery of damages.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-css-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a>&nbsp;Or, found lacking because the speech at issue would be protected by the litigation privilege, defeating the likelihood of success on the merits on the second step of the anti-SLAPP analysis.&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>See Malin v. Singer<\/em>, 217 Cal. App. 4th 1283, 1302 (2013) (holding that where demand letter was \u201cprotected by litigation privilege. . . . plaintiff [could not] establish a probability of prevailing where the litigation privilege precludes liability\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"author-jake-ayres\">Author: Jake Ayres<\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a\u00a0previous article, I discussed the often blurry line between permissible pre-litigation communications and constitutionally unprotected extortionate demands.\u00a0 However, one important dimension of the civil extortion universe was left unaddressed there\u2014that is, no claim for civil extortion can lie unless the victim actually pays the extorter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":3774,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,37],"tags":[57],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>No Cash No Claim - Offer You Can&#039;t Refuse II - Gupta Evans and Ayres<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"one important aspect the civil extortion was left unaddressed: No claim for civil extortion can lie unless the victim pays the extorter.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No Cash No Claim - Offer You Can&#039;t Refuse II - Gupta Evans and Ayres\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"one important aspect the civil extortion was left unaddressed: No claim for civil extortion can lie unless the victim pays the extorter.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Gupta Evans and Ayres\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-08-06T23:51:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-06-22T00:34:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/pexels-koolshooters-6980876-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jake Ayres\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jake Ayres\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/\",\"name\":\"No Cash No Claim - Offer You Can't Refuse II - Gupta Evans and Ayres\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/pexels-koolshooters-6980876-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-08-06T23:51:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-22T00:34:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/a130f0be54771ee7347ff2a8d66baf6a\"},\"description\":\"one important aspect the civil extortion was left unaddressed: No claim for civil extortion can lie unless the victim pays the extorter.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/pexels-koolshooters-6980876-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/pexels-koolshooters-6980876-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":1707,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"An Offer You Can\u2019t Refuse, Part II: No Cash, No Claim\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/\",\"name\":\"Gupta Evans and Ayres\",\"description\":\"Creative Strategies, Real World Solutions\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/a130f0be54771ee7347ff2a8d66baf6a\",\"name\":\"Jake Ayres\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Jake-Ayres-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Jake-Ayres-1.png\",\"caption\":\"Jake Ayres\"},\"description\":\"Favorite Quote: \u201cWhen you are content to be simply yourself, and don\u2019t compare or compete, everybody will respect you.\u201d \u2013 Lao Tzu\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No Cash No Claim - Offer You Can't Refuse II - Gupta Evans and Ayres","description":"one important aspect the civil extortion was left unaddressed: No claim for civil extortion can lie unless the victim pays the extorter.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No Cash No Claim - Offer You Can't Refuse II - Gupta Evans and Ayres","og_description":"one important aspect the civil extortion was left unaddressed: No claim for civil extortion can lie unless the victim pays the extorter.","og_url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/","og_site_name":"Gupta Evans and Ayres","article_published_time":"2021-08-06T23:51:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-06-22T00:34:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1707,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/pexels-koolshooters-6980876-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jake Ayres","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jake Ayres","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/","name":"No Cash No Claim - Offer You Can't Refuse II - Gupta Evans and Ayres","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/pexels-koolshooters-6980876-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2021-08-06T23:51:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-22T00:34:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/a130f0be54771ee7347ff2a8d66baf6a"},"description":"one important aspect the civil extortion was left unaddressed: No claim for civil extortion can lie unless the victim pays the extorter.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/pexels-koolshooters-6980876-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/pexels-koolshooters-6980876-scaled.jpg","width":1707,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/an-offer-you-cant-refuse-part-ii-no-cash-no-claim\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/socal.law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"An Offer You Can\u2019t Refuse, Part II: No Cash, No Claim"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/","name":"Gupta Evans and Ayres","description":"Creative Strategies, Real World Solutions","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/socal.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/a130f0be54771ee7347ff2a8d66baf6a","name":"Jake Ayres","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/socal.law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Jake-Ayres-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Jake-Ayres-1.png","caption":"Jake Ayres"},"description":"Favorite Quote: \u201cWhen you are content to be simply yourself, and don\u2019t compare or compete, everybody will respect you.\u201d \u2013 Lao Tzu"}]}},"featured_image_src":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/pexels-koolshooters-6980876-scaled.jpg","featured_image_src_square":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/pexels-koolshooters-6980876-scaled.jpg","author_info":{"display_name":"Jake Ayres","author_link":"https:\/\/socal.law\/author\/jake-ayres\/"},"rbea_author_info":{"display_name":"Jake Ayres","author_link":"https:\/\/socal.law\/author\/jake-ayres\/"},"rbea_excerpt_info":"In a\u00a0previous article, I discussed the often blurry line between permissible pre-litigation communications and constitutionally unprotected extortionate demands.\u00a0 However, one important dimension of the civil extortion universe was left unaddressed there\u2014that is, no claim for civil extortion can lie unless the victim actually pays the extorter.","category_list":"<a href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/category\/news\/\" rel=\"category tag\">All Blog Posts<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/socal.law\/category\/corporate-litigation\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Corporate Litigation<\/a>","comments_num":"0 comments","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3125"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3125"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3125\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3664,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3125\/revisions\/3664"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3774"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/socal.law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}