• 619.866.3444
  • info@socal.law
  • ProVisors
  • Payments
Gupta Evans and Ayres
  • What We Do
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
  • Who We Are
  • Our Team
    • Ajay Gupta
    • Chris Evans
    • Jake Ayres
    • Alessandro Nolfo
    • Aurora Gallardo
    • Mike Covington
    • Alexander Gomez
  • How We Help
    • Referral Partner Process
    • Legal Proceedings Process
    • Case Stories
  • Resources
    • The Blog
    • Our Events
    • For Lawyers
    • Useful Forms
    • Video Library
  • Payments
  • Get In Touch
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Insolvency and Corporate Responsibilities To Creditors

February 15, 2019/in All Blog Posts, Corporate Litigation/by Chris Evans

The moment a corporation becomes insolvent, a lot can change, and fast.  If the officers and directors of the company are unaware of how insolvency can transform the landscape of corporate responsibilities and duties, they run the risk of exposing themselves to liability for the corporation’s debts, even if there was no personal guaranty.  For purposes of this blog article, we look at how insolvency changes (or doesn’t change) the scope of a director’s fiduciary duties to creditors.

The Business Judgment Rule

First, a little background information.  The decisions of a company’s Board are scrutinized under what is known as the business judgment rule (the “BJR”).  The BJR provides broad latitude to the decision makers of a business, and courts will not review (i.e. second guess) directors’ business decisions or hold directors liable for errors or mistakes in judgment, so long as they satisfy the following: 

  1. Disinterested and independent; 
  2. Acting in good faith; and
  3. Reasonably diligent in informing themselves of the facts.  

When a company becomes insolvent the protections of the BJR remain largely intact.  However, the duties owed by the directors of the company become slightly larger.

Fiduciary Responsibilities

It is well established that corporate directors owe a fiduciary duty to the corporation and its shareholders and must serve in good faith, in a manner such director believes to be in the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders.  Corporations Code § 309.  Notably, this fiduciary duty is not owed to a corporations’ creditors. 

In California, only upon a company becoming insolvent does any such duty become owed to creditors.  Even with such duty, however, the duty is limited in scope and is not synonymous with the fiduciary duty directors owe to the corporation and its shareholders.  Unlike the fiduciary duty owed to the corporation and its shareholders (above), there is no statutory authority in California establishing that, upon a corporation’s insolvency, or otherwise, directors also owe a duty to the corporation’s creditors.  In fact, under current California law, there is no broad, paramount fiduciary duty of due care or loyalty that directors of an insolvent corporation owe the corporation’s creditors solely because of a state of insolvency.  Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. Boyle (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 1020, 1041. 

Rather, the duty owed by directors to creditors is an extension of the contractual relationship that already exists between the creditor and the company in question, and stems from what is known as the “trust fund doctrine. 

The Trust Fund Doctrine

The trust fund doctrine dictates that all of the assets of a corporation, immediately upon becoming insolvent, become a trust fund for the benefit of all creditors in order to satisfy their claims.  Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. Boyle (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 1020, 1040.  The scope of violations of the trust fund doctrine are limited to instances where directors or officers have “diverted, dissipated, or unduly risked the insolvent corporation’s assets.”  Id.  As such, by relying on the trust fund doctrine, California courts hold that the scope of the duty owed by corporate directors to the insolvent corporation’s creditors is limited in California only to the avoidance of actions that divert, dissipate, or unduly risk corporate assetsthat might otherwise be used to pay creditors claims. This would include acts that involve self-dealing or the preferential treatment of creditors (i.e. directors diverting assets of the corporation for benefit of insiders or preferred creditors). 

Defining Insolvency

With the existence of such a duty owed to creditors upon “insolvency,” the next question, naturally, becomes, “What is the definition of insolvency?”  Unfortunately, there are multiple definitions and, ultimately, will be an issue of fact.  California Corporations Code section 501 provides, for example, that a corporation is insolvent, if, as a result of a prohibited distribution, it would “likely be unable to meet its liabilities … as they mature.”  In the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, a finding of insolvency by the standard of a debtor not paying debts when they become due requires more than merely establishing the existence of a few unpaid debts. See In re Dill, 731 F.2d 629, 632 (9th Cir.1984).  There is also insolvency in the balance sheet sense in which the value of liabilities exceeds the value of assets. See In re Kallmeyer, 242 B.R. 492, 496–497 (9th Cir.BAP1999). 

Fortunately, because the trust-fund doctrine only deals with entities that are actually insolvent, California courts hold that there is no fiduciary duty that is owed to creditors by directors of a corporation solely by virtue of its operating in the “zone” or “vicinity” of insolvency.  Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. Boyle (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 1020, 1041.  While insolvency is a grey area in and of itself (above), the existence of a zone or vicinity of insolvency is even less objectively determinable than actual insolvency, which is further reason why California courts do not prescribe a duty owed to creditors when an entity operates in the “zone of insolvency.”  Accordingly, when a solvent corporation is navigating in the zone of insolvency, the focus for directors does not change: directors must discharge their duty to the corporation and its shareholders by exercising their business judgment in the best interests of the corporation for the benefit of the shareholder owners.

Based on the foregoing, and in conjunction wit the BJR, it follows that in order for a creditor to hold a director liable for operational decisions of the business based on allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, the creditor would need to establish the following: (1) the company was insolvent; (2) the conduct in which the director engaged amounted to self-dealing, preferential treatment of creditors, and diversion, dissipation or undue risk of corporate assets; and (3) directors were not personally disinterested and their acts were not performed in good faith and without following reasonable investigation (i.e. a rebut of the presumption afforded by the BJR).   

The challenge for a director is that the definition of insolvency is not clear under California law, as described above.  As a result, when a corporation approaches a point where it cannot pay its creditors or when a dissolution is reasonably foreseeable, it is important to understand the potential obligations to the corporation’s creditors.  The failure to recognize such obligations will expose you personally for liabilities that were once held exclusively by the corporation.  Such personal liability can come in the form of fraud or breach of fiduciary duty, which also may become non-dischargeable in a bankruptcy under 11 USC 523(a).  As such, at a minimum, you should consult with counsel to make sure your bases are covered. 

https://socal.law/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/pexels-steve-johnson-1006060-scaled.jpg 1466 2560 Chris Evans https://socal.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/gupta-evans-ayres_brand-identity_v4-02.png Chris Evans2019-02-15 23:55:002022-06-22 00:20:35Insolvency and Corporate Responsibilities To Creditors

Search Blogs

Categories

Recent Blogs

  • Out of the Frying Pan: AB 1200 and the New Online and Physical Labeling Requirements for California CookwareFebruary 22, 2023 - 12:15 am
  • The First Amendment, Bad Reviews, and You: So You’ve Been Smeared on the Internet – Part IOctober 4, 2022 - 8:49 pm
  • GEA’s Demand Letter to Union Bank Secures Release of Erroneous LoanJune 10, 2022 - 11:43 pm

Connect

HEADQUARTERS

1620 Fifth Ave #650
San Diego, CA 92101

CONTACT

P: 619-866-3444
F: 619-330-2055
E: info@socal.law

CONNECT

  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Twitter
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to Youtube
gupta evans ayres brand identity RGB Vertical White 2
smal bbb Logo
Avvo Small Logo
superlawyers Logo
small userway Logo
SDCBA Logo

© Gupta Evans & Ayres 2022 – all rights reserved

site design by digitalstoryteller.io

1620 Fifth Ave #650
San Diego, CA 92101

P: 619-866-3444
F: 619-330-2055
E: info@socal.law

  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Twitter
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to Youtube
gupta evans ayres brand identity RGB Vertical White 2

small userway Logo
smal bbb Logo
Avvo Small Logo
superlawyers Logo
SDCBA Logo

© Gupta Evans & Ayres 2022 – all rights reserved

site design by digitalstoryteller.io

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Accept settings

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Accept settingsHide notification only